skygaming

skygaming Bharat Electronics Share Price Live blog for 30 Dec 2024The methods state agencies employ for identity proofing and authentication in online public benefits applications play a crucial role in determining how efficiently applicants can access essential services. And as governments increasingly digitize their services, balancing the needs of security, accessibility, and equity becomes paramount, with identity proofing and authentication forming the backbone of digital identity management in public benefits systems. However, a new from the Beeck Center for Social Impact (BCSI) says that while the landscape of identity proofing and authentication in U.S. federal and state public benefits applications is evolving, there was only incremental progress in 2024. The new report looks at identity proofing and authentication practices across six federally funded, state-administered programs to understand when and how states use account creation, authentication, and identity proofing in initial online public benefits applications. “The way state agencies structure online account creation processes and requirements for applicants and beneficiaries to prove who they are may impact whether and how quickly individuals can apply for and start receiving benefits,” the report says, noting that while some states are adopting innovative practices and offering greater flexibility, challenges still remain in achieving equitable and effective digital identity management. By prioritizing human-centered, risk-based approaches and fostering cross-sector collaboration, the report says, state agencies can enhance the accessibility and security of public benefits systems, ensuring that all eligible individuals can access the support they need. “By documenting the landscape of current practices, this project aims to help the broad ecosystem of peer states, federal agencies, advocates, academics, and civic tech organizations identify states that are taking unique, unusual, or potentially promising approaches,” the BCSI report said, noting that “the dataset also identifies states that are putting up potential barriers through their implementation of account creation, authentication, and identity proofing.” The report says that in 2024, identity proofing requirements increased only slightly, with 42 applications implementing such measures compared to 37 in 2023. Identity proofing was most common in unemployment insurance applications, reflecting the high fraud risk associated with these benefits. However, applications for programs like MAGI Medicaid also showed a significant presence of identity proofing requirements, with 52% of applications incorporating such steps. By contrast, applications for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) assistance remained the least likely to include identity proofing, with only one state, Michigan, employing optional identity proofing in its combined application process for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Medicaid, WIC, and childcare. The timing of identity proofing steps can significantly impact user experience and system efficacy. Of the applications requiring identity proofing, 21 placed this step before an applicant could initiate the application process, while 11 integrated it into the application itself. The placement of identity proofing at the start of the process may inadvertently create barriers for individuals unable to complete this step due to technical difficulties or insufficient documentation. Such barriers, the BCSI report says, could result in eligible individuals being excluded from the application process entirely, with their struggles not being reflected in system metrics like abandonment rates. Some states, however, adopted an optional approach to identity proofing, allowing users to skip this step initially or proceed with the application even if identity verification failed. This practice, observed in 19 applications, mitigates potential exclusion while still facilitating eventual verification through alternative means. Diverse methods of identity proofing are employed across states, reflecting varying levels of risk tolerance and resource availability. Unemployment insurance (UI) applications, for instance, have seen an increasing reliance on biometric solutions, with 24 state workforce agencies utilizing technologies like ID document upload paired with live selfies for verification. By comparison, non-UI programs predominantly relied on knowledge-based verification or document submission, either in person or through the mail. The report says biometric methods often offer high levels of accuracy but can also raise concerns about privacy and accessibility. For example, individuals without access to necessary technology or those uncomfortable with biometric data collection may face difficulties completing the process. “Recognizing that beneficiaries and applicants have different levels of comfort with and access to technology, benefits administering agencies can offer beneficiaries and applicants choices about when and how to create accounts or verify their identities, if those identity management steps are relevant for a particular online interaction,” the BCSI report says. The report also says that “if applicants and beneficiaries are unable to use self-service pathways to regain access to their account when they forget or lose their password, this can drive up calls to call centers and prevent people from responding to important notices or requests for information.” A key element of effective identity proofing is offering applicants choices about how they verify their identities. The report says that in 2024, 21 agencies were found to provide multiple pathways for identity proofing, such as choosing between self-service biometric verification, video calls, or in-person verification at kiosks or post offices. This flexibility acknowledges the diversity in applicants’ circumstances and technological access, promoting inclusivity. Authentication practices in public benefits applications also varied widely, reflecting different priorities in security and user experience. In 2024, 75% of applications required users to create an account to apply online, a figure consistent with 2023. Account creation requirements were particularly prevalent in unemployment insurance applications. Among applications requiring account creation, 76% mandated the provision of an email address, underscoring the central role of email in digital identity management. Single sign-on (SSO) systems were used in 36 applications, enabling users to access multiple government services with a single set of credentials. While SSOs streamline the user experience, they also can introduce challenges if stringent security requirements, such as mandatory identity proofing, are universally applied across services with differing risk levels. Fourteen applications permitted login via third-party credentials, such as Facebook, Google, or ID.me, offering additional flexibility but raising concerns about data privacy and interoperability. Authentication methods also included layering multiple factors to enhance security. Of the reviewed applications, 79% employed at least one additional authenticator alongside passwords. These measures included one-time passcodes sent to email addresses or phones, security questions, and authenticator apps. While 56% of applications offered multiple authenticator types, enabling users to choose the most convenient option, there were notable gaps in adopting modern and secure practices. For instance, only one state, Michigan, utilized passkeys as an authentication option, which the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) identifies as a phishing-resistant authenticator. Security questions, though still used by 27 applications as the sole authenticator, exemplify an outdated practice that offers minimal security benefits, the BCSI report says, noting that such questions are susceptible to breaches and can create unnecessary friction for users. NIST’s guidelines do not recognize security questions as a reliable authenticator, highlighting the need for agencies to modernize their practices. Another significant challenge in authentication lies in ensuring that measures work effectively for diverse user populations. For example, requiring a one-time passcode sent via text may exclude individuals without reliable access to a mobile phone. Similarly, processes that demand specific technological capabilities, such as downloading an authenticator app, may not be feasible for all applicants. Human-centered design principles, which prioritize the needs and constraints of users, are critical in addressing these challenges. An emerging area of interest is the integration of phishing-resistant authenticators and risk-based authentication approaches. These methods adjust security requirements based on the sensitivity of the transaction or the user’s behavior, offering a tailored balance between security and usability. As public benefits programs explore such innovations, they must remain mindful of equity implications, ensuring that security enhancements do not inadvertently disadvantage vulnerable populations. The report states that identity proofing and authentication processes must be viewed as integral components of the broader service design for public benefits applications, and that effective implementation requires close collaboration among state agencies, federal partners, and technology vendors. BCSI said partnerships with organizations like are instrumental in developing guidelines that address the unique needs of public benefits programs. These collaborations aim to create frameworks that promote access while safeguarding sensitive data. | | | | | | |NoneMore than 100,000 state employees will get three extra days off this year after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis decided to give the workers additional time away from the job. The three days—December 23, 24 and 31—come in addition to the normally scheduled holidays on Christmas Day and New Year's Day. "Florida is in great shape, and we want to reward our state employees," DeSantis said in a statement. "After a full year—including three costly hurricanes—we hope these extra days off allow for state workers to spend more time with their families and loved ones during this holiday season." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, called the move by DeSantis a "welcome" change. "The gesture of adding additional paid holidays to the calendar is always a welcome one, and Governor DeSantis' decision to do so is certainly in line with past decisions by governors of other states," Beene told Newsweek. "For states that don't already recognize days like Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve as state holidays, expansion of holidays like this one typically happens when the state budget allows it," he said. HR consultant Bryan Driscoll, however, called DeSantis' move a "cheap political stunt" instead of a gesture of employee support. "He's trying to paper over years of anti-worker policies with a feel-good headline. It's the equivalent of tossing crumbs to workers while gutting unions and stripping away job protections," Driscoll told Newsweek. While state employees are likely to enjoy a few extra days off, the decision doesn't deal with some important issues, he said. "This move does nothing to address the real issues facing workers in Florida, like the lack of paid family leave or protections for low-wage workers," Driscoll said. "It reflects a government more interested in optics than substance, prioritizing political games over real, lasting change for the workforce." When DeSantis ran for the GOP nomination for president, he focused much of his campaign on how efficiently he ran the state's small employee base, even though Florida is the third most populous state. "Florida state government [has the] lowest number of state employees per capita in the country," DeSantis said at a CNN town hall in January. In 2022, Florida had 164,829 employees, including both full- and part-time workers. And while the national average was 198 state government workers per 10,000 residents, Florida had just 82 state employees per 10,000 residents. Florida's financial picture looks good this year, Beene said, and many state employees might have worked longer hours than expected because of Hurricanes Milton, Helene and Debby, which all made landfall in the Sunshine State. "State revenues are strong, some employees worked longer hours than expected due to multiple natural disasters, and Christmas and New Year's falling in the middle of the week make it difficult for employees wanting to spend additional time with their families capable of doing so," he said.

Bharat Heavy Electricals Share Price Today Live Updates : On the last trading day, Bharat Heavy Electricals (BHEL) opened and closed at 241.8, indicating no change in price. The stock reached a high of 242.75 and a low of 234.9 during the day. BHEL's market capitalization stands at approximately 81,968 crore, with a 52-week high of 335.4 and a low of 178.75. The BSE recorded a trading volume of 574,689 shares. Bharat Heavy Electricals Share Price Live Updates: Bharat Heavy Electricals volume yesterday was 7 mn as compared to the 20 day avg of 9611 k Bharat Heavy Electricals Share Price Live Updates: The trading volume yesterday was 25.64% lower than the 20 day average. Yesterday’s NSE volume was 6 mn & BSE volume was 574 k. Bharat Heavy Electricals Share Price Live Updates: Bharat Heavy Electricals closed at ₹241.8 on last trading day & the technical trend suggests Bearish near term outlook Bharat Heavy Electricals Share Price Live Updates: The stock traded in the range of 242.75 & 234.9 yesterday to end at 235.45. The stock is currently experiencing a strong downtrend

Former US President Jimmy Carter passed away at 100. His 1978 visit to India strengthened US-India ties, inspiring a Haryana village to rename itself Carterpuri in his honour. Washington : Jimmy Carter, 39th President of US and global advocate for peace and human rights, passed away at the age of 100. He died at his home in Plains, Georgia, surrounded by his family, according to a statement from the Carter Center. Carter, the longest-lived president in US history, was known not only for his time in office but also for his humanitarian work after leaving the White House. His presidency marked significant moments in US.-India relations, including a visit to India in 1978 during which a village in Haryana renamed itself Carterpuri in his honour. A friend to India Carter was the first US President to visit India after the Emergency was lifted in 1977, as reported by The Associated Press. During his visit, he addressed Indian Parliament, praising the country’s commitment to democracy and its rejection of authoritarianism. He highlighted India’s achievements in maintaining unity amid diversity, calling it an experiment celebrated worldwide. In a historic visit to the village of Daulatpur Nasirabad, now renamed Carterpuri, Carter connected with the local people. The visit left a lasting impression, and the villagers maintained contact with the White House throughout his presidency. To this day, January 3, the date of his visit, is celebrated as a holiday in Carterpuri. US-India ties Carter’s tenure laid the foundation for a stronger US-India partnership. His emphasis on democratic principles and mutual respect helped rebuild trust between the two nations after earlier tensions during the Nixon administration. His visit to India marked the beginning of a closer relationship that has since expanded to include cooperation in areas like energy, technology, defense and trade. The Carter Center highlighted that the relationship between the two nations has grown significantly over the years, with milestones like the 2008 civil nuclear agreement and the establishment of the US-India Strategic Dialogue in 2010, as reported by Associated Press. Joe Biden pays tribute to Carter President Joe Biden paid tribute to Carter. In a post on X, Joe Biden said, “”This is a sad day, but it brings back an incredible amount of good memories. Today, America and the world, in my view, lost a remarkable leader.” Biden called him a “leader, statesman, and humanitarian” who worked tirelessly for causes such as civil rights, human rights, and eradicating diseases. “He saved, lifted, and changed lives all across the globe,” Biden said in a post on X. Carter is survived by his four children, 11 grandchildren, and 14 great-grandchildren. His son, Chip Carter, described him as a hero who believed in peace, human rights, and bringing people together. Click for more latest World news . Also get top headlines and latest news from India and around the world at News9. Dimple Singh is a journalist by profession and an accomplished author. Currently serving as a Senior Sub-Editor at News 9, she brings with her 5 years of valuable experience in digital journalism from her previous company Times Of India. Her expertise lies in writing about crime and political news, where she skillfully combines her digital news writing abilities with a deep understanding of AI technology.In the realm of literature, Dimple has authored five compelling fictional books. Her writing reflects a passion for powerful storytelling, capturing the imaginations of readers with every word. Dimple is known for her workaholic nature, dedicating herself wholeheartedly to her profession and her love for words.SHOPPERS have been left in a frenzy over a supermarket coat that's as "soft as cashmere" and will keep you cosy this winter. Tu Clothing, the in-house fashion label for Sainsbury's, has even released the wool-look trench coat in five colours because it's so in demand. The long coat is priced at £45 and is available in sizes eight to 24. It was first released in earthy neutrals like olive green, grey and the colour of winter, chocolate brown. Supermarket bosses later added a camel colourway to the collection before bringing out a classic black version too. The chic and versatile wardrobe hero is perfect for tackling unpredictable winter weather in style and effortless layering. Read more in Fabulous Tu Clothing chiefs say: "Stay stylish in our wool-look trench coat, featuring a standard collar with a top button fastening, side pockets and a waist belt. "This transitional season coat is perfect for layering when the weather isn't as predictable as we'd like it to be!" Shoppers will have to be quick to snag the must-have piece before it flies off the shelves again - with the chocolate brown one repeatedly selling out. And delighted fashion fans who have managed to bag one are already singing the coat's praises. Most read in Fabulous One gushed: "I cannot believe that I got such a lovely coat for that amazing price. "Thank you Tu for making this coat so affordable and so lovely." A second said: "I bought this coat and I am delighted with it. I cannot believe I’m wearing a winter coat from Sainsbury’s. "The price is amazing, really good value for money. I am now a convert to Tu and happy to give up the high street brands where I’ve been spending a fortune." "I purchased both the olive and brown [and] I've recieved so many compliments", wrote a third. A fourth echoed: "Lots of compliments and disbelief at cost of coat. I have had many coats from the Tu collection and never had any disappointment." A fifth chimed in: "I had been waiting for weeks for this coat to be back in stock, finally got it and I love it. "It looks more expensive than what it was and you can dress up or down. Definitely size down if you don’t want an oversized fit." Meanwhile, a sixth cried: "It is so soft like cashmere. The coat ticked all the boxes. READ MORE SUN STORIES "Right length everything about the coat was beautiful and an excellent fit. "The coat was so nice I bought the green, brown and grey. The colours are beautiful."Aston Villa denied last-gasp winner in Juventus stalemate

Why losing QB Conner Weigman may work out in the long term for both Texas A&M and Houston

I’ve worn then returned 100 glitzy party dresses as a serial ‘wardrober’ – I get a kick out of it & don’t spend a penny

Zuckerberg’s Meta donates $1m to Trump inaugural committee amid past tensions

Donald Trump has nominated health economist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a vehement critic of COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccine mandates , to lead America's leading research agency, the National Institutes of Health. This is his latest pick as several of his Cabinet picks received "violent" threats recently. This nomination follows Trump's choice of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead Health and Human Services and Make America Healthy Again , a decision that has met with concern and criticism from the healthcare industry. In a statement Tuesday, Trump, who has previously tried to claim credit for the lifesaving Covid vaccines , declared Bhattacharya as his pick. Bhattacharya is a physician and professor at Stanford University School of Medicine. His nomination is pending Senate approval. Dr. Oz seeks to privatize Medicare as uninsured 'do not have right to health' Israel warned over 'extremely dangerous' next move that makes Gaza look like 'child's play' He will work together with RFK Jr. "to direct the Nation’s Medical Research, and to make important discoveries that will improve Health, and save lives," Trump's statement said. "Together, Jay and RFK Jr. will restore the NIH to a Gold Standard of Medical Research as they examine the underlying causes of, and solutions to, America’s biggest Health challenges, including our Crisis of Chronic Illness and Disease," he added. Bhattacharya, 56, shared a statement on X, saying that he is "honored and humbled" by Trump's decision. "We will reform American scientific institutions so that they are worthy of trust again and will deploy the fruits of excellent science to make America healthy again," he said. He is one of the three authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter written in October 2020 during Trump's administration and before the vaccine. It denounced the pandemic lockdowns, saying that they cause great harm to society. The document perpetuated "herd immunity." This concept says that people at low risk should live normal lives to build up immunity to the virus by contracting the infection. Those at higher risk should be protected instead, the document insisted. During a panel discussion with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in March 2021, he called lockdowns "the single biggest public health mistake." DON'T MISS: Israel launches 'final punishment' airstrike before Hezbollah ceasefire begins [LATEST] Senior Hamas official announces readiness for ceasefire deal amid Lebanon truce [NEW] How to survive a nuclear attack as US government shares chilling warning [CHILLING] The document was widely denounced by many disease experts, many of whom deemed it dangerous. Bhattacharya has also argued that vaccine mandates have undermined American trust in the public health system as many unvaccinated people have been barred from workplaces, schools and actitivies. Bhattacharya faced social media restrictions due to these views and was a plaintiff in Muthy v. Missouri, a Supreme Court case that argues against federal officials allegedly censoring conservative viewpoints on social media in the quest to combat misinformation. The Biden administration emerged a victor in the case. After Elon Musk acquired Twitter in 2022, he met Bhattacharya and later reinstated him on the platform like many other right-wing influencers.

#16to365: New resources for year-round activism to end gender-based violence and strengthen bodily autonomy for allBerkeley County Schools (BCS) is proud to recognize the contributions of several community partners through its Bright Lights, Big Thanks program. The initiative highlights organizations and individuals who have gone above and beyond to support the district’s students, staff and teachers. These partnerships demonstrate the critical role that businesses, organizations, and local leaders play in fostering a thriving educational environment. Whether through volunteer efforts, funding, mentorship, or program support, these collaborations enhance learning and build stronger connections between schools and the community. This year, BCS extends its gratitude to the following organizations for their outstanding commitment: Shenandoah Community Health, Friends of Music, Crossroads Church, Cacapon Institute, Martinsburg Sunrise Rotary, Martinsburg Rotary, WVU Medicine, Books A Million, Eastern WV Community Foundation, Berkeley County Professional Firefighters IAFF Local 5045, Martinsburg Police Department, Berkeley County Sheriff’s Department, Berkeley County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Bethel Assembly of God, United Way, VFW Post 5633, Friends of BCS Excess Levy Committee, New Life Church and the Berkeley County Office of Emergency Management. BCS appreciates the support of everyone who helps foster an environment where every student has the opportunity to thrive socially, emotionally, physically, and academically. Together, we are united for student success.

Paris, 27 November 2024 Capitalised terms used herein shall have the meaning specified for such terms in the Caisse Française de Financement Local base prospectus to the €75,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme dated 8 July 2024 (the “ Base Prospectus ”). Caisse Française de Financement Local has decided to issue on 29 November 2024 – Euro 1,000,000,000 Fixed Rate Obligations Foncières due 29 November 2029. A Stabilisation Manager has been named in the applicable Final Terms. The Base Prospectus dated 8 July 2024 and the supplements to the Base Prospectus dated 13 September 2024 and 30 September 2024 approved by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers are available on the website of the Issuer (https://www.caissefrancaisedefinancementlocal.fr/), at the registered office of the Issuer: 112-114, avenue Emile Zola, 75015 Paris, France, and at the office of the Paying Agent indicated in the Base Prospectus. The Final Terms relating to the issue will be available on the website of the AMF ( www.amf-france.org ) and of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (www.bourse.lu), at the office of the issuer and at the office of the paying agent. Attachment CAFFIL EMTN 2024-8_Communiqué

Angelina Jolie never expected to hit all the notes. But finding the breath of Maria Callas was enough to bring things out of Jolie that she didn’t even know were in her. “All of us, we really don’t realize where things land in our body over a lifetime of different experiences and where we hold it to protect ourselves,” Jolie said in a recent interview. “We hold it in our stomachs. We hold it in our chest. We breathe from a different place when we’re nervous or we’re sad. “The first few weeks were the hardest because my body had to open and I had to breathe again,” she adds. “And that was a discovery of how much I wasn’t.” In Pablo Larraín’s “Maria,” which Netflix released in theaters Wednesday before it begins streaming on Dec. 11, Jolie gives, if not the performance of her career, then certainly of her last decade. Beginning with 2010’s “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” Jolie has spent recent years directing films while prioritizing raising her six children. “So my choices for quite a few years were whatever was smart financially and short. I worked very little the last eight years,” says Jolie. “And I was kind of drained. I couldn’t for a while.” But her youngest kids are now 16. And for the first time in years, Jolie is back in the spotlight, in full movie-star mode. Her commanding performance in “Maria” seems assured of bringing Jolie her third Oscar nomination. (She won supporting actress in 2000 for “Girl, Interrupted.”) For an actress whose filmography might lack a signature movie, “Maria” may be Jolie's defining role. Jolie's oldest children, Maddox and Pax, worked on the set of the film. There, they saw a version of their mother they hadn't seen before. “They had certainly seen me sad in my life. But I don’t cry in front of my children like that,” Jolie says of the emotion Callas dredged up in her. “That was a moment in realizing they were going to be with me, side by side, in this process of really understanding the depth of some of the pain I carry.” Jolie, who met a reporter earlier this fall at the Carlyle Hotel, didn't speak in any detail of that pain. But it was hard not to sense some it had to do with her lengthy and ongoing divorce from Brad Pitt, with whom she had six children. Just prior to meeting, a judge allowed Pitt’s remaining claim against Jolie, over the French winery Château Miraval, to proceed. On Monday, a judge ruled that Pitt must disclose documents Jolie’s legal team have sought that they allege include “communications concerning abuse.” Pitt has denied ever being abusive. The result of the U.S. presidential election was also just days old, though Jolie — special envoy for the United Nations Refugee Agency from 2012 to 2022 – wasn’t inclined to talk politics. Asked about Donald Trump’s win, she responded, “Global storytelling is essential,” before adding: “That’s what I’m focusing on. Listening. Listening to the voices of people in my country and around the world.” Balancing such things — reports concerning her private life, questions that accompany someone of her fame — is a big reason why Jolie is so suited to the part of Callas. The film takes place during the American-born soprano’s final days. (She died of a heart attack at 53 in 1977.) Spending much of her time in her grand Paris apartment, Callas hasn’t sung publicly in years; she’s lost her voice. Imprisoned by the myth she’s created, Callas is redefining herself and her voice. An instructor tells her he wants to hear “Callas, not Maria." The movie, of course, is more concerned with Maria. It’s Larrain’s third portrait of 20th century female icon, following “Jackie” (with Natalie Portman as Jacqueline Kennedy) and “Spencer” (with Kristen Stewart as Princess Diana). As Callas, Jolie is wonderfully regal — a self-possessed diva who deliciously, in lines penned by screenwriter Steven Knight, spouts lines like: “I took liberties all my life and the world took liberties with me.” Asked if she identified with that line, Jolie answered, “Yeah, yeah.” Then she took a long pause. “I’m sure people will read a lot into this and there’s probably a lot I could say but don’t want to feed into,” Jolie eventually continues. “I know she was a public person because she loved her work. And I’m a public person because I love my work, not because I like being public. I think some people are more comfortable with a public life, and I’ve never been fully comfortable with it.” When Larraín first approached Jolie about the role, he screened “Spencer” for her. That film, like “Jackie” and “Maria,” eschews a biopic approach to instead intimately focus on a specific moment of crisis. Larraín was convinced Jolie was meant for the role. “I felt she could have that magnetism,” Larraín says. “The enigmatic diva that’s come to a point in her life where she has to take control of her life again. But the weight of her experience, of her music, of her singing, everything, is on her back. And she carries that. It’s someone who’s already loaded with a life that’s been intense.” “There’s a loneliness that we both share,” Jolie says. “That’s not necessarily a bad thing. I think people can be alone and lonely sometimes, and that can be part of who they are.” Larraín, the Chilean filmmaker, grew up in Santiago going to the opera, and he has long yearned to bring its full power and majesty to a movie. In Callas, he heard something that transfixed him. “I hear something near perfection, but at the same time, it’s something that’s about to be destroyed,” Larraín says. “So it’s as fragile and as strong as possible. It lives in both extremes. That’s why it’s so moving. I hear a voice that’s about to be broken, but it doesn’t.” In Callas’ less perfect moments singing in the film, Larraín fuses archival recordings of Callas with Jolie’s own voice. Some mix of the two runs throughout “Maria.” “Early in the process,” Jolie says, “I discovered that you can’t fake-sing opera.” Jolie has said she never sang before, not even karaoke. But the experience has left her with a newfound appreciation of opera and its healing properties. “I wonder if it’s something you lean into as you get older,” Jolie says. “Maybe your depth of pain is bigger, your depth of loss is bigger, and that sound in opera meets that, the enormity of it.” If Larraín’s approach to “Maria” is predicated on an unknowingness, he's inclined to say something similar about his star. “Because of media and social media, some people might think that they know a lot about Angelina,” he says. “Maria, I read nine biographies of her. I saw everything. I read every interview. I made this movie. But I don’t think I would be capable of telling you who she was us. So if there’s an element in common, it’s that. They carry an enormous amount of mystery. Even if you think that you know them, you don’t.” Whether “Maria” means more acting in the future for Jolie, she's not sure. “There's not a clear map,” she says. Besides, Jolie isn't quite ready to shake Callas. “When you play a real person, you feel at some point that they become your friend,” says Jolie. “Right now, it’s still a little personal. It’s funny, I’ll be at a premiere or I’ll walk into a room and someone will start blaring her music for fun, but I have this crazy internal sense memory of dropping to my knees and crying.”Carver Bancorp director Knuckles buys $14,999 in stockWhile most of the country took President-elect Donald Trump’s victory calmly, California has emerged as something of an exception. Shortly after Trump’s victory, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) called a special session of the state legislature to “safeguard California values and fundamental rights in the face of an incoming Trump administration.” Others took their own initiatives — Los Angeles declared itself a sanctuary city for immigrants. However, the move was largely symbolic, as California itself is already a sanctuary state. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT-ELECT Sanctuary cities and states limit their cooperation with immigration authorities in order to protect illegal immigrants. The status of sanctuary cities was a huge area of contention under the Trump administration. Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, warned Democratic officials in sanctuary cities and states that they could be prosecuted if they impede deportation efforts. However, as Republican Assemblyman Bill Essayli explained to the Washington Examiner, the Trump administration could force an end to California’s sanctuary status through less overt, but possibly more effective means. “Now I think what could be done, what should be done, is Congress... a lot of ways that Congress can shape state policies is with money,” he explained. “That's how they use highway funds to basically set the speed limit nationwide, and say, ‘You're not getting highway dollars unless your speed limits are X.’ “They nationalized the drinking age at 21, they did that using highway transportation funds. So the Congress could certainly withhold federal funds and say, ‘Look, you're not going to get these tax dollars unless you revoke your sanctuary state laws,’ because Congress doesn't have to give the states any money.” The first Trump administration didn’t use the tactic, something Essayli blamed on the relatively short period that Republicans had unified control of the House, Senate, and White House, and the allegations of Russian collusion that drew much of Trump’s initial attention. This time around, with more experience and a consolidated Republican Party, the strategy could more easily take effect. GREATEST COMEBACK? HERE’S HOW TRUMP STACKS UP IN WHITE HOUSE HISTORY Essayli is confident that despite California’s strong liberal convictions, a cutting off of federal dollars would quickly bring it to its knees. “There's so much money the states get for healthcare and every other issue. I mean, the state gets billions of dollars from the federal government. So I don't know how long California could survive if its federal funds were cut off, and it's a very powerful tool,” he said. “I mean, we're already facing budget shortfalls. I don't believe the state can operate without federal dollars.” “Medi-Cal alone cannot operate without federal dollars,” Essayli added. Trump is fully aware of the strategy, having hinted at implementing it if he took office while on the campaign trail. He specifically targeted federal disaster aid, in a state which can rack up tens of billions of dollars in damage due to wildfires. “We’re going to take care of your water situation, force it down his throat, and we’ll say: Gavin, if you don’t do it, we’re not giving any of that fire money that we send you all the time for all the fire, forest fires that you have,” Trump said at his Coachella rally in October. The president has full authority over the procurement of disaster aid. Matt Sedlar, climate analyst at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, told the Los Angeles Times that though California could appeal a denial of aid, the president ultimately decides on the appeal. Such a move, especially in regard to federal disaster aid, would be sure to whip up a political firestorm, however. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER “It would be a hell of a stink from members of Congress and Senate putting a lot of pressure on the president, particularly given what Trump has said is his agenda,” Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) told the outlet. “I guarantee that would happen: political blowback and a lawsuit.” Whether or not Trump decides to implement the strategy, Essayli said that Trump would launch “wide operations within these blue cities to go out and get the criminal legal aliens, with or without the help of the local officials.”Aston Villa had a stoppage-time goal disallowed as they drew 0-0 with Juventus in the Champions League. Morgan Rogers looked to have given Unai Emery’s side another famous win when he slammed a loose ball home at the death, but referee Jesus Gil Manzano ruled Diego Carlos to have fouled Juve goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the goal was chalked off. It was a disappointment for Villa, who remain unbeaten at home in their debut Champions League campaign and are still in contention to qualify automatically for the last 16. A very controversial finish at Villa Park 😲 Morgan Rogers' late goal is ruled out for a foul on Juventus goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the match ends 0-0 ❌ 📺 & — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) Emiliano Martinez had earlier displayed why he was named the best goalkeeper in the world as his wonder save kept his side level in the second half. The Argentina international paraded his two Yashin Trophies on the pitch before kick-off at Villa Park and then showed why he won back-to-back FIFA awards when he denied Francisco Conceicao. Before Rogers’ moment of drama in the fourth minute of added time, the closest Villa came to scoring was in the first half when Lucas Digne’s free-kick hit the crossbar. But a draw was a fair result which leaves Villa out of the top eight on goal difference and Juventus down in 19th. Before the game Emery called Juventus one of the “best teams in the world, historically and now”, but this was an Italian side down to the bare bones. Only 14 outfield players made the trip from Turin, with striker Dusan Vlahovic among those who stayed behind. The opening 30 minutes were forgettable before the game opened up. Ollie Watkins, still chasing his first Champions League goal, had Villa’s first presentable chance as he lashed an effort straight at Di Gregorio. Matty Cash then had a vicious effort from the resulting corner which was blocked by Federico Gatti and started a counter-attack which ended in Juventus striker Timothy Weah. Villa came closest to breaking the deadlock at the end of the first half when Digne’s 20-yard free-kick clipped the top of the crossbar and went over. Martinez then produced his brilliant save just after the hour. A corner made its way through to the far post where Conceicao was primed to head in at the far post, but Martinez sprawled himself across goal to scoop the ball away. How has he kept that one out?! 🤯 Emi Martinez with an INCREDIBLE save to keep it goalless at Villa Park ⛔️ 📺 & — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) Replays showed most of the ball went over the line, but the Argentinian got there with millimetres to spare. At the other end another fine goal-line block denied John McGinn as Manuel Locatelli got his foot in the way with Di Gregorio beaten. The game looked to be petering out until a last-gasp free-kick saw Rogers slam home, but whistle-happy official Gil Manzano halted the celebrations by ruling the goal out.